Research is raising concerns about the environmental effects of lab-grown meat, despite its reputation as a sustainable alternative to livestock farming.
A study was done by a group of researchers from UCD and Holtville University in California and it investigated the possible negative sides of current production methods for cultured meat.
Their study discovered that lab-grown meat production may release more CO2 per kilogram of meat than conventional beef, depending on the production techniques the company uses.
Lab-Grown Meat Is More Complex than You Can Imagine
Meat grown in Petri dishes requires cultivating animal cells into edible tissues like connective tissues or fat.
This method requires less water, land, and additives, but the production of it has environmental consequences linked to the nutrients that the lab meat needs to grow.
The process requires extracting growth factors from animal serums and growing crops for vitamins and sugars. All of this adds to the environmental footprint.
Also, purifying the ingredients to a high standard is energy-consuming and this is vital for the prevention of microbial contamination.
A Balance Between the Impact on the Environment & Technological Advancements
By lowering the energy needs via a food-grade standard for purification, the greenhouse gas emissions released during lab meat production can be lowered to over a quarter more than those of traditional beef farming.
With the right conditions, lab-grown meat could become up to 80 percent greener than raising cattle.
Still, researchers note that these have to be major technical advancements to better the performance and lower the costs associated with growing meat from cells.
Could the Key to a Sustainable Future Be a Reevaluation of Priorities?
Currently, the argument is that investments in livestock farm efficiency may be a better approach to reducing the environmental footprint linked with the production of meat.
These measures may provide a more immediate reduction in emissions than the lab-grown meat industry. The cultured meat industry may be evaluated in its footprint on the environment.
The sensible nature of the animal cell cultures requires specialized and energy-intensive bioreactors that contribute to the environmental consequences of this industry.
The researchers emphasize the need to focus on the major issues and work on resolving technical challenges before the production is scaled up.
Plant-Based Alternatives
With the many challenges associated with cultured meat, the interest in plant-based alternatives is exponentially growing. Plant protein has gained a reputation as a greener alternative and is praised for its environmental and human health advantages.
These proteins demand fewer resources to be produced than traditional farming and lab-grown meat.
It uses less water, energy, and land. Also, these proteins don’t lead to deforestation or release greenhouse gases.
The plant-based meat alternatives have significantly improved in terms of taste, nutritional profile, and texture. Companies are implementing innovative tech and methods to replicate the texture and flavor of meat using plant products.
Plant-based protein is beneficial for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the fight against deforestation, and the preservation of natural resources.
Though lab-grown meat has its benefits, addressing the current problems associated with the environmental impact and ensuring technical advancement are necessary.
Embracing plant-based alternatives is a practical and sustainable alternative to traditional meat. When we consume plant-based protein, we’re contributing to a greener future yet still enjoying a nutritional product that’s similar in taste and texture to traditional meat.
Sources:
